रणनीतिक चुस्ती और सततता-उन्मुख नवाचार: जॉर्डन की सार्वजनिक शेयरधारिता वाली औद्योगिक कंपनियों में अधिगमशील संगठन की मध्यस्थ भूमिका
सारांश
रणनीतिक चुस्ती और सततता-उन्मुख नवाचार: जॉर्डन की सार्वजनिक शेयरधारिता वाली औद्योगिक कंपनियों में अधिगमशील संगठन की मध्यस्थ भूमिका
सारांश
यह अध्ययन रणनीतिक चुस्ती और सततता-उन्मुख नवाचार के बीच संबंध की जाँच करता है। साथ ही, यह परखता है कि अधिगमशील संगठन इस संबंध में मध्यस्थ की भूमिका निभाता है या नहीं। क्षमता–प्रेरणा–अवसर (AMO) सिद्धांत के आधार पर अध्ययन विचार करता है कि सीखने को बढ़ावा देने वाला कार्य परिवेश कंपनियों को रणनीतिक लचीलेपन से सततता-उन्मुख नवाचार की ओर बढ़ने में कैसे मदद कर सकता है। जॉर्डन की सार्वजनिक शेयरधारिता वाली औद्योगिक कंपनियों के वरिष्ठ और मध्यम स्तर के 303 प्रबंधकों का चयन स्तरीकृत यादृच्छिक प्रतिचयन से किया गया। संरचित प्रश्नावली से प्राप्त आँकड़ों का विश्लेषण SmartPLS 3.3.9 और SPSS 25 से किया गया।
रणनीतिक चुस्ती का सततता-उन्मुख नवाचार और अधिगमशील संगठन के विकास, दोनों से सकारात्मक और सांख्यिकीय रूप से सार्थक संबंध पाया गया। मध्यस्थता विश्लेषण ने संकेत दिया कि रणनीतिक चुस्ती और सततता-उन्मुख नवाचार के संबंध में अधिगमशील संगठन की पूर्ण मध्यस्थ भूमिका थी। AMO सिद्धांत के अनुसार, निष्कर्ष संकेत देते हैं कि सीखने को बढ़ावा देने वाला कार्य परिवेश कर्मचारियों को अपनी क्षमताएँ विकसित करने, सीखने की प्रेरणा बनाए रखने और ज्ञान साझा करके उसे सततता से जुड़ी चुनौतियों पर लागू करने के अवसर दे सकता है। यह अध्ययन एक उभरती अर्थव्यवस्था के संदर्भ में सततता-उन्मुख नवाचार को समझने के लिए AMO सिद्धांत के अनुप्रयोग का विस्तार करता है।
मुख्य शब्द — रणनीतिक चुस्ती, सततता-उन्मुख नवाचार, अधिगमशील संगठन, क्षमता–प्रेरणा–अवसर सिद्धांत, मध्यस्थता, जॉर्डन।
डाउनलोड
संदर्भ
- Adams, R., Jeanrenaud, S., Bessant, J., Denyer, D., & Overy, P. (2016). Sustainability-oriented innovation: A systematic review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18(2), 180– 205. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12068
- Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932–968.
- Ahmed, I. (2022). Strategic agility and organizational performance: Evidence from dynamic environments. Journal of Strategy and Management, 15(2), 287–305. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-09-2021-0194
- Alavi, S., & Wahab, D. A. (2013). A review on workforce agility. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 5(16), 4195–4199.
- Almansoori, A., & Nobanee, H. (2019). How sustainability contributes to shared value creation and firms’ value. SSRN Electronic Journal
- Al-Najjar, B., & Anfimiadou, A. (2012). Environmental policies and firm value. Business Strategy and the Environment, 21(1), 49–59
- Alshurideh, M., Al Kurdi, B., Masa’deh, R., & Salloum, S. A. (2023). The role of agile strategy in enhancing organizational performance. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9(1), 100023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100023
- Appelbaum, E., Bailey, T., Berg, P., & Kalleberg, A. (2000). Manufacturing advantage: Why highperformance work systems pay off. Cornell University Press
- Armanious, A. (2019). Organizational learning, agility, and performance. The Learning Organization, 26(3), 272–286. https://doi.org/10.1108/TLO-05-2018-0077
- Armanious, A., & Padgett, R. C. (2021). Organizational learning and strategic agility: A multilevel perspective. Management Research Review, 44(4), 487–506. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-02-2020-0069
- Armanious, M. (2019). Knowledge organizations’ learning strategies to develop agile core competencies (Doctoral dissertation, University of Phoenix)
- Arsawan, I. W. E., Koval, V., Rajiani, I., Rustiarini, N. W., & Suhartanto, D. (2022). Leveraging knowledge sharing and innovation capability for sustainability performance. Sustainability, 14(4), 2345. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042345
- Babber, G., & Mittal, A. (2023). Achieving sustainability through the integration of lean, agile, and innovative systems. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-02-2023-0015
- Bainbridge, H. (2015). Devolving people management to the line: How different rationales for devolution influence people management effectiveness. Personnel Review, 44(6), 847–865. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-02-2014-0022
- Bansal, P., Bertels, S., Ewart, T., MacConnachie, P., & O’Brien, J. (2012). Bridging the research– practice gap. Academy of Management Perspectives, 26(1), 73–92. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2010.0101
- Battistella, C., De Toni, A. F., De Zan, G., & Pessot, E. (2017). Cultivating business model agility through focused capabilities. Journal of Business Research, 73, 65–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.09.023
- Beise, M., & Rennings, K. (2005). Lead markets and environmental innovation. Ecological Economics, 52(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.06.005
- Benevene, P., & Buonomo, I. (2020). Green human resource management: An evidence-based systematic literature review. Sustainability, 12(15), 5974. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12155974
- Bertels, S., Papania, L., & Papania, D. (2010). Embedding sustainability in organizational culture. Network for Business Sustainability. https://nbs.net/knowledge/embeddingsustainability-in-organizational-culture
- Bos-Brouwers, H. E. J. (2010). Corporate sustainability and innovation in SMEs: Evidence of themes and activities. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(7), 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.652
- Bos-Nehles, A. C., van Riemsdijk, M. J., & Looise, J. C. (2013). Employee perceptions of line management performance. Human Resource Management, 52(6), 861–877. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.2156
- Cândea, D. (2007). Conjectures about the relationship among business sustainability, learning organization, and management systems integration. Keynote speaker address to the International Conference on Business Excellence ICBE-2007, Brasov, Romania,
- Carrillo-Hermosilla, J., Del Río, P., & Könnölä, T. (2010). Diversity of eco-innovations: Reflections from selected case studies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(10–11), 1073–1083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.03.012
- Chen, C. J., & Cuervo, D. (2022). Learning organization and innovation performance. Journal of Knowledge Management, 26(6), 1525–1544. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-03-2021-0213
- Chen, C., Maguire, P., & Jacobson, D. (1998). The effect of organizational culture on the performance of IT projects. Information & Management, 34(2), 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378- 7206(98)00035-1
- Cheung, G. W., Cooper-Thomas, H. D., Lau, R. S., & Wang, L. C. (2024). Testing discriminant validity in structural equation modeling. Organizational Research Methods, 27(1), 3–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/10944281221124256
- Christofi, M., Leonidou, E., & Vrontis, D. (2024). Sustainability-oriented leadership and innovation. Journal of Business Ethics, 188(1), 89–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05133-9
- Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Routledge.
- Cosenz, F., Rodrigues, V. P., & Rosati, F. (2020). Dynamic business modeling for sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(2), 651–664. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2421
- Daily, B. F., & Huang, S. C. (2001). Achieving sustainability through attention to human resource factors in environmental management. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(12), 1539–1552. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000006317
- Edgar, F., Zhang, J. A., & Blaker, N. M. (2021). The HPWS and AMO: A dynamic study of system- and individual-level effects. International Journal of Manpower, 42(5), 794–809. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-09-2020-0460
- Forés, B., & Camisón, C. (2016). Does incremental and radical innovation performance depend on knowledge accumulation? Journal of Business Research, 69(2), 831–848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.07.006
- Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
- Francis, D. (2017). The auditing of agile capability: Revisiting CENTRIM’s agile wheel model. Auditing Agility
- Francis, D. L. (2020). Exploiting agility for advantage: A step-by-step process for acquiring requisite organisational agility. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.
- Franke, G., & Sarstedt, M. (2019). Heuristics versus statistics in discriminant validity testing: A comparison of four procedures. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 26(6), 917–939. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2019.1635253
- Fuertes, G., Alfaro, M., Vargas, M., Gutierrez, S., Ternero, R., & Sabattin, J. (2020). Conceptual framework for the strategic management: a literature review—descriptive. Journal of engineering, 2020(1), 6253013.
- Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2023). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Sage.
- Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Gudergan, S. P. (2023). Advanced issues in partial least squares structural equation modeling. Sage
- Hansen, E. G., Grosse-Dunker, F., & Reichwald, R. (2009). Sustainability innovation cube: A framework for evaluating sustainability-oriented innovations. International Journal of Innovation Management, 13(4), 683–713. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919609002434
- Henseler, J., Hubona, G., & Ray, P. A. (2016). Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: Updated guidelines. MIS Quarterly, 40(2), 297–316. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2016/40.2.01
- Iqbal, Q., & Ahmad, N. H. (2021). Sustainable leadership in learning organizations. Sustainable Development, 29(1), 108–119. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2177
- Jaumotte, F., & Pain, N. (2005). From innovation development to implementation: Evidence from the community innovation survey. OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 459. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/789097430093
- Kiron, D., Kruschwitz, N., Haanaes, K., & von Streng Velken, I. (2011). Sustainability nears a tipping point. MIT Sloan Management Review, 52(2), 69–74
- Klewitz, J., & Hansen, E. G. (2014). Sustainability-oriented innovation of SMEs. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.017
- Knoppen, D., & Knight, L. (2022). Sustainability advantage and dynamic capabilities. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(4), 1789–1813.
- Kuckertz, A., & Wagner, M. (2010). The influence of sustainability orientation on entrepreneurial intentions—Investigating the role of business experience. Journal of business venturing, 25(5), 524-539.
- Lee, O. K. D., Sambamurthy, V., Lim, K. H., & Wei, K. K. (2015). How does IT ambidexterity impact organizational agility? MIS Quarterly, 39(2), 417–442. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2015/39.2.05
- Rennings, K., Ziegler, A., Ankele, K., & Hoffmann, E. (2006). The influence of different characteristics of the EU environmental management and auditing scheme on technical environmental innovations and economic performance. Ecological Economics, 57(1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.03.022
- Rigolizzo, M. (2019). Ready and willing to learn: Exploring personal antecedents to taking on learning challenges. Journal of Workplace Learning, 31(4), 289–304. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-10-2018-0102
- Tseng, C.-H., Chang, K.-H., & Chen, H.-W. (2019). Strategic orientation, environmental innovation capability, and environmental sustainability performance: The case of Taiwanese suppliers. Sustainability, 11(4), 1127. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041127
- Zakrzewska, M., Piwowar-Sulej, K., Jarosz, S., Sagan, A., & Sołtysik, M. (2022). Agile project management and sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 30(5), 855–869. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2321