लेख

रणनीतिक चुस्ती और सततता-उन्मुख नवाचार: जॉर्डन की सार्वजनिक शेयरधारिता वाली औद्योगिक कंपनियों में अधिगमशील संगठन की मध्यस्थ भूमिका

Jassim Hassan Farhan
Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Development, University of Baghdad (1)
प्राप्त2026-02-02
संशोधित2026-04-06
स्वीकृत2026-07-22
प्रकाशित2026-08-23

सारांश

रणनीतिक चुस्ती और सततता-उन्मुख नवाचार: जॉर्डन की सार्वजनिक शेयरधारिता वाली औद्योगिक कंपनियों में अधिगमशील संगठन की मध्यस्थ भूमिका

सारांश

यह अध्ययन रणनीतिक चुस्ती और सततता-उन्मुख नवाचार के बीच संबंध की जाँच करता है। साथ ही, यह परखता है कि अधिगमशील संगठन इस संबंध में मध्यस्थ की भूमिका निभाता है या नहीं। क्षमता–प्रेरणा–अवसर (AMO) सिद्धांत के आधार पर अध्ययन विचार करता है कि सीखने को बढ़ावा देने वाला कार्य परिवेश कंपनियों को रणनीतिक लचीलेपन से सततता-उन्मुख नवाचार की ओर बढ़ने में कैसे मदद कर सकता है। जॉर्डन की सार्वजनिक शेयरधारिता वाली औद्योगिक कंपनियों के वरिष्ठ और मध्यम स्तर के 303 प्रबंधकों का चयन स्तरीकृत यादृच्छिक प्रतिचयन से किया गया। संरचित प्रश्नावली से प्राप्त आँकड़ों का विश्लेषण SmartPLS 3.3.9 और SPSS 25 से किया गया।

रणनीतिक चुस्ती का सततता-उन्मुख नवाचार और अधिगमशील संगठन के विकास, दोनों से सकारात्मक और सांख्यिकीय रूप से सार्थक संबंध पाया गया। मध्यस्थता विश्लेषण ने संकेत दिया कि रणनीतिक चुस्ती और सततता-उन्मुख नवाचार के संबंध में अधिगमशील संगठन की पूर्ण मध्यस्थ भूमिका थी। AMO सिद्धांत के अनुसार, निष्कर्ष संकेत देते हैं कि सीखने को बढ़ावा देने वाला कार्य परिवेश कर्मचारियों को अपनी क्षमताएँ विकसित करने, सीखने की प्रेरणा बनाए रखने और ज्ञान साझा करके उसे सततता से जुड़ी चुनौतियों पर लागू करने के अवसर दे सकता है। यह अध्ययन एक उभरती अर्थव्यवस्था के संदर्भ में सततता-उन्मुख नवाचार को समझने के लिए AMO सिद्धांत के अनुप्रयोग का विस्तार करता है।

मुख्य शब्द — रणनीतिक चुस्ती, सततता-उन्मुख नवाचार, अधिगमशील संगठन, क्षमता–प्रेरणा–अवसर सिद्धांत, मध्यस्थता, जॉर्डन।

डाउनलोड

2सारांश दृश्य

संदर्भ

  1. Adams, R., Jeanrenaud, S., Bessant, J., Denyer, D., & Overy, P. (2016). Sustainability-oriented innovation: A systematic review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18(2), 180– 205. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12068
  2. Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932–968.
  3. Ahmed, I. (2022). Strategic agility and organizational performance: Evidence from dynamic environments. Journal of Strategy and Management, 15(2), 287–305. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-09-2021-0194
  4. Alavi, S., & Wahab, D. A. (2013). A review on workforce agility. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 5(16), 4195–4199.
  5. Almansoori, A., & Nobanee, H. (2019). How sustainability contributes to shared value creation and firms’ value. SSRN Electronic Journal
  6. Al-Najjar, B., & Anfimiadou, A. (2012). Environmental policies and firm value. Business Strategy and the Environment, 21(1), 49–59
  7. Alshurideh, M., Al Kurdi, B., Masa’deh, R., & Salloum, S. A. (2023). The role of agile strategy in enhancing organizational performance. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9(1), 100023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100023
  8. Appelbaum, E., Bailey, T., Berg, P., & Kalleberg, A. (2000). Manufacturing advantage: Why highperformance work systems pay off. Cornell University Press
  9. Armanious, A. (2019). Organizational learning, agility, and performance. The Learning Organization, 26(3), 272–286. https://doi.org/10.1108/TLO-05-2018-0077
  10. Armanious, A., & Padgett, R. C. (2021). Organizational learning and strategic agility: A multilevel perspective. Management Research Review, 44(4), 487–506. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-02-2020-0069
  11. Armanious, M. (2019). Knowledge organizations’ learning strategies to develop agile core competencies (Doctoral dissertation, University of Phoenix)
  12. Arsawan, I. W. E., Koval, V., Rajiani, I., Rustiarini, N. W., & Suhartanto, D. (2022). Leveraging knowledge sharing and innovation capability for sustainability performance. Sustainability, 14(4), 2345. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042345
  13. Babber, G., & Mittal, A. (2023). Achieving sustainability through the integration of lean, agile, and innovative systems. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-02-2023-0015
  14. Bainbridge, H. (2015). Devolving people management to the line: How different rationales for devolution influence people management effectiveness. Personnel Review, 44(6), 847–865. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-02-2014-0022
  15. Bansal, P., Bertels, S., Ewart, T., MacConnachie, P., & O’Brien, J. (2012). Bridging the research– practice gap. Academy of Management Perspectives, 26(1), 73–92. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2010.0101
  16. Battistella, C., De Toni, A. F., De Zan, G., & Pessot, E. (2017). Cultivating business model agility through focused capabilities. Journal of Business Research, 73, 65–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.09.023
  17. Beise, M., & Rennings, K. (2005). Lead markets and environmental innovation. Ecological Economics, 52(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.06.005
  18. Benevene, P., & Buonomo, I. (2020). Green human resource management: An evidence-based systematic literature review. Sustainability, 12(15), 5974. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12155974
  19. Bertels, S., Papania, L., & Papania, D. (2010). Embedding sustainability in organizational culture. Network for Business Sustainability. https://nbs.net/knowledge/embeddingsustainability-in-organizational-culture
  20.  Bos-Brouwers, H. E. J. (2010). Corporate sustainability and innovation in SMEs: Evidence of themes and activities. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(7), 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.652
  21. Bos-Nehles, A. C., van Riemsdijk, M. J., & Looise, J. C. (2013). Employee perceptions of line management performance. Human Resource Management, 52(6), 861–877. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.2156
  22. Cândea, D. (2007). Conjectures about the relationship among business sustainability, learning organization, and management systems integration. Keynote speaker address to the International Conference on Business Excellence ICBE-2007, Brasov, Romania,
  23. Carrillo-Hermosilla, J., Del Río, P., & Könnölä, T. (2010). Diversity of eco-innovations: Reflections from selected case studies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(10–11), 1073–1083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.03.012
  24. Chen, C. J., & Cuervo, D. (2022). Learning organization and innovation performance. Journal of Knowledge Management, 26(6), 1525–1544. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-03-2021-0213
  25. Chen, C., Maguire, P., & Jacobson, D. (1998). The effect of organizational culture on the performance of IT projects. Information & Management, 34(2), 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378- 7206(98)00035-1
  26. Cheung, G. W., Cooper-Thomas, H. D., Lau, R. S., & Wang, L. C. (2024). Testing discriminant validity in structural equation modeling. Organizational Research Methods, 27(1), 3–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/10944281221124256
  27. Christofi, M., Leonidou, E., & Vrontis, D. (2024). Sustainability-oriented leadership and innovation. Journal of Business Ethics, 188(1), 89–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05133-9
  28. Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Routledge.
  29. Cosenz, F., Rodrigues, V. P., & Rosati, F. (2020). Dynamic business modeling for sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(2), 651–664. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2421
  30. Daily, B. F., & Huang, S. C. (2001). Achieving sustainability through attention to human resource factors in environmental management. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(12), 1539–1552. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000006317
  31. Edgar, F., Zhang, J. A., & Blaker, N. M. (2021). The HPWS and AMO: A dynamic study of system- and individual-level effects. International Journal of Manpower, 42(5), 794–809. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-09-2020-0460
  32. Forés, B., & Camisón, C. (2016). Does incremental and radical innovation performance depend on knowledge accumulation? Journal of Business Research, 69(2), 831–848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.07.006
  33. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
  34. Francis, D. (2017). The auditing of agile capability: Revisiting CENTRIM’s agile wheel model. Auditing Agility
  35. Francis, D. L. (2020). Exploiting agility for advantage: A step-by-step process for acquiring requisite organisational agility. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.
  36. Franke, G., & Sarstedt, M. (2019). Heuristics versus statistics in discriminant validity testing: A comparison of four procedures. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 26(6), 917–939. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2019.1635253
  37. Fuertes, G., Alfaro, M., Vargas, M., Gutierrez, S., Ternero, R., & Sabattin, J. (2020). Conceptual framework for the strategic management: a literature review—descriptive. Journal of engineering, 2020(1), 6253013.
  38. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2023). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Sage.
  39. Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Gudergan, S. P. (2023). Advanced issues in partial least squares structural equation modeling. Sage
  40. Hansen, E. G., Grosse-Dunker, F., & Reichwald, R. (2009). Sustainability innovation cube: A framework for evaluating sustainability-oriented innovations. International Journal of Innovation Management, 13(4), 683–713. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919609002434
  41. Henseler, J., Hubona, G., & Ray, P. A. (2016). Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: Updated guidelines. MIS Quarterly, 40(2), 297–316. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2016/40.2.01
  42. Iqbal, Q., & Ahmad, N. H. (2021). Sustainable leadership in learning organizations. Sustainable Development, 29(1), 108–119. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2177
  43. Jaumotte, F., & Pain, N. (2005). From innovation development to implementation: Evidence from the community innovation survey. OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 459. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/789097430093
  44. Kiron, D., Kruschwitz, N., Haanaes, K., & von Streng Velken, I. (2011). Sustainability nears a tipping point. MIT Sloan Management Review, 52(2), 69–74
  45. Klewitz, J., & Hansen, E. G. (2014). Sustainability-oriented innovation of SMEs. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.017
  46. Knoppen, D., & Knight, L. (2022). Sustainability advantage and dynamic capabilities. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(4), 1789–1813.
  47. Kuckertz, A., & Wagner, M. (2010). The influence of sustainability orientation on entrepreneurial intentions—Investigating the role of business experience. Journal of business venturing, 25(5), 524-539.
  48. Lee, O. K. D., Sambamurthy, V., Lim, K. H., & Wei, K. K. (2015). How does IT ambidexterity impact organizational agility? MIS Quarterly, 39(2), 417–442. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2015/39.2.05
  49.  Rennings, K., Ziegler, A., Ankele, K., & Hoffmann, E. (2006). The influence of different characteristics of the EU environmental management and auditing scheme on technical environmental innovations and economic performance. Ecological Economics, 57(1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.03.022
  50. Rigolizzo, M. (2019). Ready and willing to learn: Exploring personal antecedents to taking on learning challenges. Journal of Workplace Learning, 31(4), 289–304. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-10-2018-0102
  51. Tseng, C.-H., Chang, K.-H., & Chen, H.-W. (2019). Strategic orientation, environmental innovation capability, and environmental sustainability performance: The case of Taiwanese suppliers. Sustainability, 11(4), 1127. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041127
  52. Zakrzewska, M., Piwowar-Sulej, K., Jarosz, S., Sagan, A., & Sołtysik, M. (2022). Agile project management and sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 30(5), 855–869. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2321
  53.