लेख

«गरिमा» से «भाड़ में जाएँ वे» तक — चिली के संवैधानिक जनमत-संग्रहों के टेलीविज़न अभियानों में बदलती चुनावी अपीलें

Nel Richard (1)
1. George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia, US, and 2University of Richmond, Richmond, Virginia,
US. Email: nel.richard@richmond.edu
प्राप्त2026-02-20
संशोधित2026-03-10
स्वीकृत2026-07-23
प्रकाशित2026-08-17

सारांश

«गरिमा» से «भाड़ में जाएँ वे» तक — चिली के संवैधानिक जनमत-संग्रहों के टेलीविज़न अभियानों में बदलती चुनावी अपीलें

सारांश

लातिन अमेरिका के कई लोकतंत्रों में राजनीतिक दलों की कमज़ोरी, संस्थाओं के प्रति व्यापक अविश्वास और राजनीतिक अभिजात वर्ग के प्रति बढ़ती नाराज़गी चुनावी संचार को कठिन बनाती हैं। पिछले अध्ययनों ने इन परिस्थितियों के कारणों की पड़ताल की है, जबकि चुनावी संदेशों पर इनके असर को कम समझा गया है। यह लेख चिली के तीन संवैधानिक जनमत-संग्रह अभियानों के टेलीविज़न विज्ञापनों का विश्लेषण करता है और उन्हें तैयार करने वाले रचनात्मक तथा राजनीतिक दलों के सदस्यों से शोध के लिए लिए गए साक्षात्कारों का उपयोग करता है। इसमें विरोधी पक्षों द्वारा उठाए गए मुद्दों और उनकी दल-आधारित, नीति-आधारित, सामान्य तथा भावनात्मक अपीलों की तुलना की गई है।

दलगत संदेशों के अभाव में अभियानों ने शुरुआत में नीति-आधारित अपीलों का सहारा लिया। बाद में वे अधिक सामान्य अपीलों की ओर बढ़े और अंततः उन्होंने राजनीति-विरोधी संदेश अपनाए। विश्लेषण इस बदलाव को मतदाता आधार के विस्तार और संविधान सभा के प्रति बढ़ते अविश्वास से जोड़ता है। अध्ययन में यह भी पाया गया कि यथास्थिति के पक्षधर अभियानों ने बदलाव की वकालत करने वाले अभियानों की तुलना में नकारात्मक भावनाएँ जगाने वाली भाषा का अधिक इस्तेमाल किया। निष्कर्ष बताते हैं कि मतदाता आधार और संविधान बनाने वाली संस्था के प्रति विश्वास में बदलाव से मतदाताओं को लामबंद करने के लिए इस्तेमाल की जाने वाली भाषा कैसे बदल सकती है।

मुख्य शब्द — चिली, संवैधानिक जनमत-संग्रह, टेलीविज़न पर चुनावी विज्ञापन, भावनात्मक अपीलें, राजनीति-विरोधी संदेश, संस्थागत अविश्वास।

डाउनलोड

2सारांश दृश्य

संदर्भ

Aguilar, Rosario, and Jeffrey Conroy-Krutz. 2020. “Electoral Persuasion in the New Democracies Challenges and

Opportunities.” In The Oxford Handbook of Electoral Persuasion, edited by Elizabeth Suhay, Bernard Grofman, and

Alexander H. Trechsel. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190860806.013.46.

Alemán, Eduardo, and Patricio Navia. 2023. “Chile’s Failed Constitution: Democracy Wins.” Journal of Democracy

34 (2): 90–104. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2023.0014.

ApruebaxChile, dir. 2022. Franja del apruebo 2022—Capítulo 16. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kb-CGxM2MlE.

Barozet, Emmanuelle, Dante Contreras, Vicente Espinoza, Modesto Gayo, and María Luisa Méndez. 2021. Clases

medias en tiempos de crisis: Vulnerabilidad persistente, desafíos para la cohesi´on y un nuevo pacto social en Chile. Cepal

and COES. https://repositorio.cepal.org/handle/11362/47184.

Black, Iain, Paul Baines, Ning Baines, Nicholas O’Shaughnessy, and Roger Mortimore. 2023. “The Dynamic

Interplay of Hope Vs. Fear Appeals in a Referendum Context.” Journal of Political Marketing 22 (2): 143–171.

https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2021.1892900.

Boas, Taylor C. 2015. “Voting for Democracy: Campaign Effects in Chile’s Democratic Transition.” Latin American

Politics and Society 57 (2): 67–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-2456.2015.00267.x.

Boas, Taylor C. 2016. Presidential Campaigns in Latin America: Electoral Strategies and Success Contagion. Cambridge

University Press.

Boas, Taylor C., and F. Daniel Hidalgo. 2011. “Controlling the Airwaves: Incumbency Advantage and Community Radio

in Brazil.” American Journal of Political Science 55 (4): 869–885. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00532.x.

Boukala, Salomi, and Dimitra Dimitrakopoulou. 2017. “The Politics of Fear Vs. the Politics of Hope: Analysing the

2015 Greek Election and Referendum Campaigns.” Critical Discourse Studies 14 (1): 39–55. https://doi.org/10.

1080/17405904.2016.1182933.

Boyd, Ryan L., Ashwini Ashokkumar, Sarah Seraj, and James W. Pennebaker. 2022. The Development and Psychometric

Properties of LIWC-22. University of Texas at Austin. https://www.liwc.app/.

Brader, Ted. 2005. “Striking a Responsive Chord: How Political Ads Motivate and Persuade Voters by Appealing to

Emotions.” American Journal of Political Science 49 (2): 388–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0092-5853.2005.00130.x.

Brader, Ted. 2006. Campaigning for Hearts and Minds: How Emotional Appeals in Political Ads Work. University of

Chicago Press.

Calvo, Ernesto, and Maria Victoria Murillo. 2004. “Who Delivers? Partisan Clients in the Argentine Electoral

Market.” American Journal of Political Science 48 (4): 742–757. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00099.x.

Campbell, Angus, Philip E. Converse, Warren E. Miller, and Donald E. Stokes. 1980. The American Voter. University of

Chicago Press. https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/A/bo24047989.html.

Castro Cornejo, Rodrigo. 2021a. “How Do Campaigns Matter? Independents, Political Information, and the

Enlightening Role of Campaigns in Mexico.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 33 (4): 779–798.

Castro Cornejo, Rodrigo. 2021b. “Short- and Long-Term Partisanship: Campaign Effects and the Stability of Party

Identification in Latin America.” Latin American Research Review 56 (2): 300–317. https://doi.org/10.25222/larr.638.

CEP. 2020. “Encuesta CEP N° 84, diciembre 2019.” https://www.cepchile.cl/encuesta/estudio-nacional-de-opinionpublica-n84-diciembre-2019-2/ 

CEP. 2022. “Encuesta CEP N° 86, abril–mayo 2022.” https://www.cepchile.cl/encuesta/estudio-nacional-de-opinio

n-publica-n86-abril-mayo-2022/.

CEP. 2023. “Encuesta CEP N° 89, junio–julio 2023.” https://www.cepchile.cl/encuesta/encuesta-cep-n-89/.

Ciudadanos a Favor de Chile, dir. 2022a. Capítulo XXV: Franja ciudadana por el rechazo. https://www.youtube.com/wa

tch?v=FrJAppC7Yjg.

Ciudadanos a Favor de Chile, dir. 2022b. La ducha #RechazoXAmor. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XzC3qEG-

0SE.

Ciudadanos a Favor de Chile, dir. 2023. Capítulo 7: ¡Que Se Jodan! #VoyAFavor. https://www.youtube.com/watch?

v=MH4wUloP524.

CNTV. 2020a. “CNTV informa distribuci´on del tiempo de la franja televisiva del plebiscito.” https://cntv.cl/2020/

02/cntv-informa-distribucion-del-tiempo-de-la-franja-televisiva-del-plebiscito/.

CNTV. 2020b. “Evaluaci´on de la franja plebiscito 2020.” https://cntv.cl/estudio/evaluacion-de-la-franja-plebiscito-

2020/.

CNTV. 2022. “Casi nuevemillones de personas vieron la franja y 20% dice que la propaganda cambi´o su voto | Consejo

Nacional de Televisi´on.” https://cntv.cl/2022/09/impacto-de-la-franja-electoral-alrededor-de-nueve-millonesde-

personas-vieron-el-espacio-y-20-de-los-encuestados-declaro-que-la-propaganda-cambio-su-voto/.

CNTV. 2023a. “Encuesta de evaluaci´on franja electoral plebiscito constitucional 2023.” https://cntv.cl/estudio-re

positorio/encuesta-de-evaluacion-franja-electoral-plebiscito-constitucional-2023/.

CNTV. 2023b. Franja oficial plebiscito constitucional 17 de noviembre 12:45. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sDu

6TaIaNys.

Crabtree, Charles, Matt Golder, Thomas Gschwend, and Indriđi H. Indriđason. 2020. “It Is Not Only What You Say, It

Is Also How You Say It: The Strategic Use of Campaign Sentiment.” Journal of Politics 82 (3): 1044–1060. https://

doi.org/10.1086/707613.

Decide Chile. 2023. “Participaci ´on electoral.” 2023. https://live.decidechile.cl/2023/consejeros.

Democracia Cristiana, Revoluci ´on Democrática, Renovaci´on Nacional, Comunes, Partido Socialista, Partido por la

Democracia, Partido Liberal, et al. 2019. “Acuerdo por la paz social y la nueva Constituci´on.” https://obtienea

rchivo.bcn.cl/obtienearchivo?id=documentos/10221.1/76280/1/Acuerdo_por_la_Paz.pdf.

Disi Pavlic, Rodolfo. 2018. “Sentenced to Debt: Explaining Student Mobilization in Chile.” Latin American Research

Review 53 (3): 448–465. https://doi.org/10.25222/larr.395.

Disi Pavlic, Rodolfo Disi. 2024. “Indigenous Voices and Votes: Assessing the Dynamics of Indigenous Politics in

Chile’s Constitutional Referendum of 2022.” PS: Political Science & Politics, January, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1017/

S1049096523000872.

Donoso, Sofia and Sehnbruch, Kirsten. 2020. “Social Protests in Chile: Inequalities and Other Inconvenient Truths about

Latin America’s Poster Child.” Global Labour Journal 11 (1): 52–58.

ECLAC (Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean). 2021. Preliminary Overview of the Economies of

Latin America and the Caribbean 2020. United Nations.

González, Ricardo, and Carmen Le Foulon Morán. 2020. “The 2019–2020 Chilean Protests: A First Look at Their

Causes and Participants.” International Journal of Sociology 50 (3): 227–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207659.

2020.1752499.

Greene, Kenneth F. 2011. “Campaign Persuasion and Nascent Partisanship in Mexico’s New Democracy.” American

Journal of Political Science 55 (2): 398–416. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00497.x.

Greene, Kenneth F. 2019. “Dealigning Campaign Effects in Argentina in Comparative Perspective.” In Campaigns

and Voters in Developing Democracies: Argentina in Comparative Perspective, 162–186. University of Michigan Press.

Groenendyk, Eric. 2016. “The Anxious and Ambivalent Partisan: The Effect of Incidental Anxiety on Partisan

Motivated Recall and Ambivalence.” Public Opinion Quarterly 80 (2): 460–479. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/

nfv083 

Heiss, Claudia. 2023. “El proceso constituyente en Chile.” Nueva Sociedad, May–June, 126–135.

Heiss, Claudia, and Julieta Suárez-Cao. 2024. “Constitution-Making in the 21st Century: Lessons from the Chilean

Process.” PS: Political Science & Politics, January, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1017/S104909652300104X.

Hermosilla, Ignacio. 2023. “‘Que se jodan’: La frase que enciende la polémica entre a favor y en Contra, previo al

plebiscito.” BioBio Chile, November 26. https://www.biobiochile.cl/noticias/nacional/chile/2023/11/26/que-sejodan-

la-frase-que-enciende-la-polemica-entre-a-favor-y-en-contra-previo-al-plebiscito.shtml.

Huertas-Hernández, Sergio, and Valeria Palanza. 2024. “Lawmaking and Presidential Attributes in the Chilean

Constitution: What’s the Urgency?” PS: Political Science & Politics, January, 253–258.

Iyengar, Shanto, Gaurav Sood, and Yphtach Lelkes. 2012. “Affect, Not Ideology.” Public Opinion Quarterly 76 (3):

405–431. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfs038.

Jiménez-Ya˜nez, César. 2020. “#ChileDespert ´ o: Causas del estallido social en Chile.” Revista Mexicana de Sociología

82 (4): 949–957. https://doi.org/10.22201/iis.01882503p.2020.4.59213.

Latin American Research Review 77

https://doi.org/10.1017/lar.2025.10098 Published online by Cambridge University Press

Keefer, Philip, and Gabriel L. Negretto. 2024. “Shifting Electorates and Preferences in Chile’s Constitutional

Process.” PS: Political Science & Politics, January, 248–252 https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096523000902.

Larraín, Guillermo, Gabriel Negretto, and Stefan Voigt. 2023. “How Not to Write a Constitution: Lessons from

Chile.” Public Choice 194 (3–4): 233–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-023-01046-z.

Latorre, Senador Juan Ignacio, dir. 2023. ¿A quién quieren joder? El 17 de diciembre Chile vota #encontra. https://www.

youtube.com/watch?v=Y5ALI05A5ik.

Lazarsfeld, Paul F., Bernard Berelson, and Hazel Gaudet. 1944. The People’s Choice: How the Voter Makes Up His Mind in

a Presidential Campaign. Columbia University Press.

Lilleker, Darren G., and Duje Bonacci. 2017. “The Structure of Political E-Expression: What the Brexit Campaign

Can Teach Us about Political Talk on Facebook | Intellect.” International Journal of Digital Television 8 (3): 335–350.

Luna, Juan Pablo. 2014. Segmented Representation: Political Party Strategies in Unequal Democracies. Oxford University

Press.

Luna, Juan Pablo. 2021. La chusma inconsciente: La crisis de un país atendido por sus propios due˜nos. Catalonia.

Luna, Juan Pablo, and David Altman. 2011. “Uprooted but Stable: Chilean Parties and the Concept of Party System

Institutionalization.” Latin American Politics and Society 53 (2): 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-2456.2011.

00115.x.